Forgeries: Why We Feel Betrayed
by Shirley M. Mueller, M.D.
Consider two porcelain pieces side by side. To the untrained eye, they appear indistinguishable. Yet, one is an original. The other is a copy. Ask anyone which they prefer, and, virtually without exception, they will choose the authentic, though they cannot say why. This preference is a deeply rooted psychological and neurological phenomenon, one that shapes the behavior of collectors, casual admirers, and even people who have never set foot inside an auction house.
Figure A: Authentic plate
Figure B: “Fake” plate
photo: Angela Howard
The philosophical term for this tendency is essentialism: the view that objects possess an inner nature or essence fundamental to what they are. Translated into the world of collecting, essentialism means that we respond not only to what an object looks like but also to what we believe it to be. The platter that belonged to George and Martha Washington is the real thing. The plate decorated in modern times does not have the same appeal. When the story differs between the two, our feelings shift entirely.
Neuroscience gives us a window into this process. In experiments using functional magnetic resonance imaging, researchers found that when subjects were given wine to taste and told it was expensive, a distinctive region of the brain called the orbitofrontal cortex lit up with activity (Figure C). This area is associated with pleasure and reward during experiential tasks. When those same subjects were given identical wine and were told they were drinking cheap wine, the orbitofrontal cortex went quiet. The wine did not change. The label did. What the brain was processing, in other words, was not simply flavor but meaning, constructed from the story told related to it.
The same principle extends to art and antiques in ways that collectors understand intuitively, even if they rarely articulate it in these terms. When we stand before a work we believe to be authentic, we are not merely evaluating its aesthetic qualities. We are connecting with its history, its maker, and its journey through time to this moment. That connection carries real emotional weight, and the brain registers it as genuine pleasure. Strip away the authenticity, even in imagination, and the pleasure diminishes. We feel something close to betrayal, because what was violated was not just our wallet but our belief, the story we constructed around the object.
A neurological condition known as Capgras syndrome illuminates this same dynamic from an entirely different angle. People with this syndrome, typically following head trauma or the onset of dementia, come to believe that the people closest to them have been replaced
by impostors. A woman may look at her husband of 40 years and recognize every familiar feature, yet feel convinced she is speaking to a stranger wearing his face. The emotional bond is severed from the perceptual recognition. What the condition reveals is how much our warmth toward the people and objects we love depends not on their physical appearance alone but also on our belief in their essential identity. Change that belief, whether through neurological disruption or simple disclosure of a forgery, and the emotional response changes.
This has direct implications for the art market, a world where authenticity is not merely a philosophical nicety but a financial and emotional cornerstone. The history of collecting is threaded with stories of celebrated works that were later exposed as forgeries. When Han van Meegeren’s paintings, long attributed to Vermeer, were revealed to be his own creations in the 1940s, the critical establishment was stunned, partly because the forgeries had been praised so extravagantly. Once the truth emerged, those very same canvases became curiosities rather than masterpieces. The brushwork had not changed, only the story, and with it, what mattered about the canvases.
Yet the power of story and belief is not confined to the rarefied world of fine art. It operates just as forcefully at the everyday human scale. When an Iraqi journalist threw his shoe at President George W. Bush during a press conference in Baghdad in 2008, the shoe in question became an object of enormous symbolic interest. A Saudi multimillionaire offered ten million dollars for it. He was not proposing to display a shoe because of its craftsmanship or comfort.
He wanted it because of what it represented, the singular moment in history it had participated in, the story it carried. The object was, in the most literal sense, unremarkable. The story made it extraordinary.
Figure C: MRI of orbitofrontal cortex
This same alchemy operates at far more intimate levels, with no headlines required. A wedding ring worn by a beloved grandmother, a handwritten letter tucked in a drawer, a childhood confirmation gift that has traveled with someone for decades: none of these objects would command notice at an estate sale, yet their owners would be devastated to lose them. What they hold is not monetary value but meaning, a dense accumulation of memory and story that makes them, to those who love them, irreplaceable. No duplicate, however exact, could substitute.
What emerges from the neuroscience, the philosophy, the clinical syndrome, and the everyday experiences of collectors and ordinary people is a coherent picture of how human beings actually value things. We are not pure aesthetes evaluating objects on their merits alone.
We are story-driven creatures, and the stories we attach to objects become woven into our experience of them at a neurological level. Authenticity matters because it guarantees that the story is true. Discover that the story was false, and the pleasure we took in the object, genuine as it felt, loses its footing.
This is why a collector who discovers a treasured piece is a forgery is not merely disappointed but feels wronged. And it is why, in the end, the authentic piece will always matter to us because our desire for what is real is ingrained in our nature.
Sponsored
