The social platform for antiquers, collectors, and enthusiasts

Pottery of South Carolina's Edgefield District

clay jar with flower
On February 11, 1919, Paul Rea, director of The Charleston Museum, acquired a stoneware jar characteristic of those made in Edgefield, South Carolina. Of course, it wasn’t the first piece of pottery the museum had ever received but, unlike the few others, this one was different. Immediately noticeable was its gargantuan size, something that not even photographs can adequately capture. Measuring just under 2-and-a-half-feet tall with a 28-inch diameter (at the rim) and a capacity of at least 40 gallons, the piece might have been considered a work of art as much as a meat storage vessel. Besides dimensions, however, there was something else equally important. Inscribed into the clay at the jar’s broad shoulders were two names and a date: “Dave & Baddler, May 13, 1859.” On the opposite side, a short verse: “Made at Stoney Bluff, for making and adgin enuff.”
Now, while Rea may have been curious about the writings, his successor, Laura Bragg, was fascinated by them. Becoming The Charleston Museum’s director in 1920, Bragg had developed a vital interest in “Carolina clay” and, especially, the enslaved potters who worked it. Eventually, Bragg’s research, which included first-person interviews and repeated visits to long-abandoned pottery sites, would yield data quintessential to understanding the whole story of what was a once considerable enterprise, “Edgefield Pottery.”
Storage jar signed “Dave & Baddler / May 13, 1859” on one side and inscribed on the other, “Made at Stoney Bluff / for making or adgin enuff”
pottery pitcher
Stoneware pitcher attributed to Benjamin Franklin Landrum Pottery, c.1860

The Beginning of a Local Industry

By 1860, The Edgefield district was about 950,000 square acres positioned midway between the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Atlantic Ocean on the western edge of South Carolina at the Savanna River –– what is today Edgefield, Aiken, McCormick, and Saluda counties. For most of the nineteenth century, it held dozens of family-connected potteries, each producing massive amounts of wares for use throughout the south.
The genesis for the eventual establishment, production, and commerce of South Carolina pottery is perhaps best attributed to the lackluster desirability for European-made porcelain, considered in the mid-1700s “an expression of the needs and taste of the peasantry” compared to the ultra-refined wares exported from the Orient. However, the discovery of kaolin-essential for making both hard and soft-paste porcelain-in the Carolina interior gave western ceramicists, they hoped, a way to produce wares comparable to those of their Asian counterparts. Getting their hands on it, though, would not be easy. Several expeditionary groups had already ventured inland to gather the so-called “Cherokee Clay.” Even Josiah Wedgewood sent agents to procure “an earth, the product of the Cherokee Nation in America,” but found the exploit too dangerous and expensive to continue.

Eventually, as settlements expanded westward, a physician, printer, publisher, and pottery owner named Dr. Abner Landrum arrived in Edgefield and was quick to make a name for himself, especially after his re-discovery of kaolin in 1809. Despite the encouraging news, though, Landrum, like those before him, found the harvesting of kaolin too problematic to make profitable amounts of fine porcelain. Thus, he quickly turned his attention to Edgefield’s basic clay, using it to produce a more practical, utilitarian material, stoneware. For Landrum, it was a wise decision. A high-fired, industrial ceramic, stoneware pottery was an essential tool in an agrarian economy like South Carolina’s. It vitrified beautifully, which resulted in a durability well suited for food storage. By 1820, Dr. Landrum, along with some family and a number of enslaved people, had built a prominent community around his stoneware pottery. This mini-empire of sorts was occasionally referred to as Landrumville or, more popularly, Pottersville and was, as one resident described, “a village altogether supported by the manufacture of stoneware.” As Pottersville grew in both area and success, other potteries emerged around it, some with names associated with their nearby locations like Kirksey’s Crossroads, Horse Creek Valley, and Stoney Bluff. Landrum’s nephew, Collin Rhodes, ran two highly successful potteries at Shaw’s Creek, advertising hollowware “in all sizes” and “inferior to none made in the United States.”
clay jar with flower
Decorated storage jar attributed Collin Rhodes Factory at Shaw’s Creek, c.1850
Dave’s inscribed signature on one of his stoneware works, 1859
stoneware pot
Storage jar inscribed by Dave for Panzerbieter’s Grocers, “King and Columbus Ste, Charleston, S.C.”

The Story of Dave

Pleased with Pottersville’s success, Abner Landrum eventually sold most of his stoneware interests to nephew, Harvey Drake who brought to the business an additional number of enslaved Africans. Of these, it was the “turners,” who were of particular value. Turners were the backbone of any pottery; each having a specific skill set to form clay into myriad vessels, and a potter called Dave was one of them.
Born circa 1800, Dave first appeared in Harvey Drake’s 1818 mortgage as a “boy about 17 years old.” Though he had possibly learned stoneware by this age, he was certainly a skilled individual by the time Drake died in 1832, being valued at a relatively high price of $400 in the estate. Dave’s workmanship notwithstanding, perhaps most noteworthy for his time and place was his proclivity for signing, dating and, on at least thirty known occasions, inscribing poetic verse on his finished wares. Verse that, as far as the law was concerned, never should have been put there in the first place.

South Carolina laws against educating slaves had been on the books since 1740 and were as solid as ever at the time of Dave’s birth. These same laws were only exacerbated after a well-planned slave revolt in 1822 was unsuccessful. Fearful, the General Assembly enacted even more unforgiving literacy codes, adding a strict penalty for anyone teaching “slave or free colored children to read or write.”
It is difficult to positively identify how, when, or exactly where Dave learned to read or write. Moreover, since he marked his works again and again in the face of oppressive laws against such a thing, how did he get away with it? Theories abound on both. In becoming literate, one hypothesis suggests that Harvey Drake taught him. A”profoundly religious man,” Drake could have felt the need to give Dave access to the bible, something a few denominations had advocated in spite of the law. Another theory is that he was put to work as a typesetter for the local newspaper, the Edgefield Hive, owned by Abner Landrum. It’s also possible that Lewis Miles, one of his subsequent owners, permitted Dave’s writings so that he could better personalize products for commercial buyers. One surviving example of this customization is a storage jar unsigned by Dave but inscribed by him for Charleston’s Panzerbieter Grocery Store.
Whatever his reasons and allowances, Dave’s poignant, whimsical, even romantic inscriptions create an almost personal connection to him. “His works … touch that part acutely attuned to the daily life of the rural community and the rhythm of routines, which require an innate sense of timing,” wrote Charleston artist Jonathan Green in 1998. ‘His hands on the clay and his foot on the treadle using his unique creative energy and personality to breathe life and history into what would otherwise be simply utilitarian objects.”

Gathering Elusive Information

Laura Bragg was likely feeling much the same way in the 1930s whilst gathering whatever data she could in pursuit of Dave’s elusive story and those of other Edgefield potters. Indeed, his remarkable messages present him as a creative and thoughtful man.
He makes known his wit in 1836: Horses, mules and hogs / all our cows is in the bogs / there they shall ever stay / till the buzzards take them away
His business sense in 1858: This noble jar will hold 20 / fill it with silver then you’ll have plenty

writing on pot
Detail of storage jar signed “Dave / 31 July, 1840,” and inscribed, “Dave belongs to Mr. Miles, wher the oven bakes and the pot biles”
His piety in 1862: I made this jar all of cross / If you don’t repent, you will be lost
And, regrettably, his lot in life in 1840: Dave belongs to Mr. Miles, wher the oven bakes & the pot biles
As Bragg continued her research into the 1930s, it was through a pair of interviews that uncovered an interesting, if not dramatic, detail of Dave’s life. On both occasions, she was told of a rather unfortunate accident that Dave endured during the course of his career. “Sure I knew Dave,” was how Mrs. Carey Dickson described him to Bragg. “It was at that time he belonged to old man Drake, and it was at that time he got his leg cut off. They say he got drunk and laid on the railroad track.” The other source, Mrs. Fletcher, who at the time was living in Lesslie, S.C., further noted to Bragg that she remembered Dave as being “mighty good” at turning pots, despite his having but one leg.
Now, it’s questionable at best as to when exactly Dave lost his leg. Dickson’s quote puts it somewhere before 1832, yet other notations in Bragg’s papers suggest the troubling event might have occurred much later. Whatever the case, the fact that Dave was able to continue making pottery with only one leg to drive his treadle is, in a word, remarkable. There were, however, some occasions where Dave had help. When Dave fell under the ownership of Abner Landrum’s brother, John, for example, he was paired with a fellow enslaved worker named Henry, who had lost the use of at least one arm. Henry, of course, still had two good legs to treadle the wheel while Dave put his hands to the clay. Later, while enslaved at Stoney Bluff in the 1850s, Dave, working together with another potter, Baddler, was put to work making large meat storage jars including the aforementioned 40-gallon piece, which Dave signed for both Baddler and himself.
Clearly, Baddler was a good match for Dave. After all, his name appears alongside Dave’s on more than this one pot. In fact, another mammoth 40-gallon storage jar arrived at The Charleston Museum in 1920, not quite a year after the first one. Just like the other, it was signed “Dave and Baddler” and, in Dave’s unmistakable penmanship, included the verse, “Great and Noble jar hold sheep goat or bear.” Amazingly, a quick comparison of the two pieces together reveals that both vessels are dated the same, May 13, 1859. Thus, if Dave is to be believed (and there is no reason not to), he and Baddler created these two massive works on the same day. To date, they are the largest Dave pieces known.
Detail of storage jar signed “Dave & Baddler / May 13, 1859” on one side and inscribed on the other, “Great and Noble Jar / hold Sheep goat or bear”

Post-Civil War Pottery

Like many enterprises in the American South, the Civil War greatly disrupted Edgefield’s pottery industry. Of the numerous potteries scattered about the Edgefield district in 1860, only two were operational in 1870. The wider availability of glass and metal containers didn’t help things either. By the mid-1880s, however, new generations of old potters were reviving Edgefield’s antebellum success, exhibiting the same durability and resolve of the stone-ware they produced. Landrum descendent Benjamin Franklin Landrum, for instance, by 1880 was producing upwards of $5,000 worth of stoneware goods.

Meanwhile, his cousin John Miles (son of Lewis Miles, owner of Stoney Bluff), was operating “Miles Mill and Pottery,” which boasted a “thirty-five-horsepower water turbine.” As for the dozens of unrecognized, emancipated potters, some understandably moved on. Others, Dave included, entered into wage-paying contracts with their former masters. Finally a free man, Dave formalized his first name to David and adopted the surname of his first owner, Drake.
An 1870 federal census listed David Drake, age 70, as a turner still making pottery near Edgefield. Alas, it was the last time he was ever recorded. Cohabitating with one Mark Jones, also listed as a “turner, age 35,” it’s possible that Dave spent the last few years of his life teaching a fellow potter to carry on his legacy.

All images courtesy of The Charleston Museum